![]() ![]() Tensions are critical to this enterprise, and it seems likely that the way forward is Importantly, acknowledging internal variation and The continued growth and consolidation of the field, and necessary to meet a range ofĮxciting upcoming challenges. That a better understanding of the landscape of the digital humanities is vital to Overview of the landscape and an exploration of four concrete encounters. The landscape ofĭigital humanities is explored more broadly through a “fly-through” critical That is sometimes suggested but rarely analyzed in more detail. In the current article, I start out from a broad notion of the digital humanities Technology as a tool, study object, expressive medium, exploratory laboratory and Modes of engagement between the humanities and information technology can help chartĪnd understand the digital humanities. The third part of the article, it is suggested that a model based on paradigmatic Humanities Computing Program at the University of Alberta, and Internet Studies. Is an exploration of four concrete encounters: ACTLab at University of Texas atĪustin, the Humanities Arts Science Technology Advanced Collaboratory (HASTAC), the Landscape, and a discussion of what being a digital humanist entails. ![]() Study starts out from typologies of digital humanities, a “flythrough” of the That awareness across this landscape is important to the future of the field. ![]() Of a broadly conceived landscape of digital humanities in some depth. The field isĮxpanding and at the same time being negotiated, and this article explores the idea The digital humanities is increasingly becoming a “buzzword”, and there is moreĪnd more talk about a broadly conceived, inclusive digital humanities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |